1. We have learned : there are 3 district criminal courts. One constitutional called, United States district court, one territorial called, United States District Court; and one policy/administration non-constitutional court called the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT is a special court which holds no lawful jurisdiction over any citizen, and appears to be formed under the unincorporated association of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. More on this will be forthcoming later. All these courts operate under the same judges; courthouses; and courtrooms.

2. We have also learned: that there are 2 Federal criminal appellate courts; one Article III constitutional called the “circuit court of appeals” and a territorial Court established called the United States Court of Appeals which does not have to operate under the Constitution. Again, established by the legislature.

3. It took between 1934 to 1948; (a 14-year period) to set into motion a corrupt system to totally control the lives of all US citizens. Once the corrupt court system of controlling all citizens by law was in place, all that needed to be done was to sit back and wait until the majority of corrupt people employed by the Government, who put this treasonous system in place; were out of office, retired, or died. Meanwhile this new dictator court system could be enacted on a small scale, and tested for its corrupt intent, which it did successfully.

4. Many Federal judges were reluctant to go along with this two and three court system. One allowing constitutional rights and legal rights; while the other court allowed constitutional and legal rights at their own discretion . Some Federal judges quit when they were apprised.

5. Laws must be developed, passed by the Zealot Democracy to protect the judges that knew all about this evil plan. Lifetime jobs were authorized for these Federal judges. It is presumed large pay offs were made, and still may be to many of these Federal judges. Judges made “themselves” immune from every law, and rule they violated in their courtrooms. Also these judges gave themselves immunity from violations of the constitutional rights of all the sovereign citizens and States of the United States.

6. It is also presumed that in the beginning, many US prosecutors and Assistant US prosecutors found out about this sinister plan and forced the Federal courts to grant them immunity also. Which the judges rapidly did. In actuality; it appeared; very corrupt Assistant US attorneys totally control the courtrooms across the United States; quite possibly by blackmail. Most assuredly what the Federal judges were doing; allowing US citizens to be unlawfully tried and convicted in a non-constitutional court, could well be a treasonous act; not only against the Constitution, but against the people of the United States (Ref. Cohens v. Virginia, 6 Wheat 264 5 L.Ed. 257). Supreme Court Justice Marshall stated regarding the Rule of Necessity ; that a court must address constitutional rights issues even though the court may not want to. To not address them would be Treason to the Constitution.

7. There seems to be more suggested in Supreme Court Marshall’s statement; that just treason against the Constitution. His statement clearly says much more; as “treason to the Constitution” constitutes treason to the Republic; treason to the states; and treason to each sovereign citizen of the United States.

8. Was the final act that removed the Republic and installed the evil Zealot/Democracy. A pure treasonous act against every Republic sovereign citizen and every sovereign state in the 50 United States?

9. On its face; and by name; the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act; enacted by Congress in 1976; appeared to apply to foreign nations and countries. Although such were mentioned; the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA); was designed for one purpose only.

1. You should read this 1603 section first to see if you can understand what these slick advisory committee and knowing legislative representatives are saying.

2. Keep sec. 1603 displayed as we go through the word and phrase actual meanings.

(1) title 28 1603(a) starts off: a foreign state except as used in section 1608

• Let’s look at 1608. It has nothing to do with anything, except serving an entity with some type of complaint.

3. Let’s continue with 1603 foreign state definition. It continues to give the definition of a foreign state by saying in this section, “foreign state” includes a political subdivision of a foreign State or an agency, or an instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in subsection (b). Well so far 1603(a) has said a bunch of mumbo jumbo except to tell us to go to 1603(b) to find out what the meaning of a “foreign state” is. So now foreign state means agency, or an instrumentality of a foreign state defined in (b).

4. Let’s go to 1603(b) . This states an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state means any entity -
      (1) which is a separate legal person , corporate or otherwise.

WAIT A MINUTE: a separate legal person is every citizen within the United States. That’s me!! And You!! We are all “legal persons” states (Black’s Law 7).

5. Let’s continue to 1603(b) (2). It’s total mumbo jumbo. The meaning of “organ of a foreign state” does not exist in any dictionary to include Black’s Law dictionary and the definition of Political Subdivision in Black’s 6 th is even more mumbo jumbo. It appears you and I could also qualify as an organ of a foreign State and an instrumentality of a Foreign State.

Wait A Minute: What!

1. Have you ever been called an: Agency??

2. Have you ever been called a: Foreign State??

3. US Congress’s; Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act, in 1976 just defined you, me and every other sovereign citizen within the United States a foreign State.

Remember: what these slick legislators and their legal beagle committee members have put in the definition of the law in title 28 1603: "Definitions – for the purposes of this chapter-"! The law just stated for purposes of the Sovereign Immunities Act; a person is a foreign state; among other things.

6. Here’s a big one: 1603(3) “which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (d) of this title.”

Wait a minute: That sounds like if I’m a citizen; then this does not apply! Let’s look at section 1332 (c) and (d). This section is talking about corporations being citizens, liability insurance, estate of a decedent and that the District of Columbia is included as a State. Well! This does not apply to you and I. And (d) and (e) of 1603 speaks only about commercial activity.

11. So what does this cloaked word and phrase definition actually mean in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act?

1. The definition of "Foreign state" is you and I and every other Sovereign citizen within the 50states. We are also called an “agency” and apparently a “political subdivision of a foreign state” and an “instrumentality of a foreign state.”

You don’t suppose they are attempting to “hide”
the fact, that this “Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act” is speaking about every sovereign citizen in the United States

12. This rich and powerful group: Zealot/Democracy ; and their bought and paid for legislators and advisory committee members; wouldn’t try to put anything over on the unsuspecting hard working honest citizens of the United States???? And destroy the Republic they are sovereign citizens in, would they ????

The declaration and findings of the FSIA is stated in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act in title 28 sec. 1602. The first long sentence says it ALL.

It states : that in the interest of justice, foreign states and litigants are immune from jurisdiction in United States courts .

1. Who is a foreign State? You and I!

2. What court are you and I immune in? All United States courts. Notice the first letter in courts is a small c. That means you and I and every other citizen within the United States is immune from civil or criminal prosecution by the United States in all constitutional Article III United States courts.

3. Of course that does not include the laws of the land set forth in the Constitution; which make treason, counterfeiting, and piracy a crime against the United States. That clearly appears to be covered in the last sentence of 1602. Where it says: claims by foreign states (all sovereign citizens of the 50 states) of immunity should be decided by courts of the United States. (Notice: again the c in courts is not capitalized and of course as you have already learned the district and appellate courts of the United States are constitutional Article III courts and must adhere to the US Constitution.)

14. Now we have found out what was hidden : Congress admitted in 1976 what every citizen should have been taught in school (hidden from the public eyes with “word phrases” and word “definitions”) that the United States courts have no jurisdiction to enforce or prosecute any citizen of the United States for laws passed by the U.S. legislature.

15. As stated prior : as a Republic; the US Government cannot pass and enforce laws against any state, or any citizen unless such laws are contained within the Constitution. The passing and enforcing of laws in a republic Government is to be done only by each state’s legislature to protect the sovereign rights of every person within each sovereign state.

There’s more:

16. Congress reconfirms this fact in their Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act in title 28 sec. 1604. Looking at sec. 1604; Congress states, "a foreign state (every citizen) shall be immune from the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States" (Article III constitutional courts).

That’s great: Congress gave us all immunity that we all knew we had. (Even though they hid it with phrases and definitions.)

Wait A Minute: - What’s this?

17. Title 28 sec. 1604 states : we all are entitled to total immunity from the US constitutional courts. Congress just stated what we were given in 1791 by the Constitution, only no one was told and few know today.

Except: as provided in sections 1605 “to” 1607 of this chapter! Let’s look at title 28 sec. 1605 through sec. 1607. Well there is nothing that appears to effect our immunity from the Government courts in sec. 1605 a (2) through 1607. However!!

Red Light: sec. 1605(a) (1) (Blue P): there is a huge problem here!! It states a foreign state (meaning you, I and every other US citizen) shall not be immune from the US courts if we waived our immunity either explicitly or by implication .

18. That’s serious trouble for everyone:

What does that mean?? Wave our immunity either explicitly or by implication.

1. Explicit means : “having no disguised meaning” “clear in understanding” (Ref. Black’s 6 th)

2. Implication means: Big trouble here!!!! Meaning: inference instead of words. Information gathered by implication or deduction from circumstances. “An inference of something not directly declared, but arising from what is admitted or expressed (Ref. Black’s 6 th). To suggest by some act, however not stated in words. (3) “to convey or communicate not by direct forthright statement “but by allusion” (Ref. Webster’s Unabridged 1993).

19. The Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act was passed so the Zealot/Democracy could unconstitutionally enforce all the laws passed by the U.S. legislature for the District of Columbia and U.S. territories upon every sovereign citizen and sovereign states in the United States. Exactly what the US Constitution “forbids”!!!

1. First these people that wrote and passed the FSIA and declared what we all knew in 1976; that we are all sovereign citizens of a republic subject only to the laws of each state; not the Federal Government. And that the Federal courts had no jurisdiction over the States, or it s citizens as we were immune from such authority except for treason, counterfeiting, and piracy; via the Constitution.

2. These Zealots and their corrupt government employees, had to cloak the fact they had admitted to the fact; that the US Government had no jurisdiction to enforce the laws they passed for any of their possessions against any citizen, or state of the Union. They didn’t want anyone to realize what they were doing.

3. Then they also didn’t want anyone to know that they passed a law that said you gave up your right as a sovereign citizen of the Republic; by a waiver of implication.

   (1) Who decides if you gave up your rights by implication? Answer: the Federal judges of course.

   (2) How can they decide if you were willing to give up your rights? Answer: It’s their “discretion,” in their courtrooms. They make the “decision,” at their “discretion” when you entered their courtroom, and , you don’t even know you gave up your immunity as the Federal judges remove your immunity.

   (3) The Federal prosecutors also know; by the “law of the land,” (the Constitution) they cannot indict you as a citizen for anything except treason, counterfeiting, and piracy; but they do it anyway.

20. How do the Federal judges take away anyone’s immunity??

1. There are many ways. Federal judges can do anything at their discretion. And its totally their discretion to decide if anyone gave up their immunity by implication. Remember; implication is anything any Federal judge wants it to be.

Example: Let’s say: you were indicted and charged with fraud against the Justice Department, or selling 10 oz. of marijuana, or whatever other unlawful federal crimes there are allegedly against US citizens. Remember! The prosecutor knows the grand jury indictment is unlawful, because they know they can only indict a citizen for treason, counterfeiting, and piracy.

(1) You or your attorney accept an unlawful indictment. Any judge could easily decide; at their discretion; that your acceptance of the indictment was a waiver of your immunity from the US Government and US courts’ jurisdiction. You accepted the indictment; that’s good enough for them .

21. A more sophisticated way would be :

1. A Federal criminal court system is put in place over a period of years where each Federal Criminal Courthouse; courtroom and judge holds criminal court in a constitutional court, a territorial court and a defacto, kangaroo COURT for an unincorporated association called THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

2. These courts all have the same names; idem sonans spelled differently: United States district court; The United States District Court and the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT. The name of the “unlawful” unincorporated association is: THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

3. 99.9% of all indictments have read: over the past 30 years:

The following document is the first page of the original indictment of James T. Kimball that he received when he was indicted.